` structure that the gates check.

2. **The requested topic is the problem.** The keyword “iida palosaari nude” targets sexualized images of a named real person. Repairing an article built for that query would make it more discoverable. The research notes also say they contain nothing about Iida Palosaari, so an article under her name couldn’t be sourced anyway.

If you want a Finnish article on removing non-consensual deepfake intimate images, with no personal name and a keyword such as “väärennetty intiimikuva poisto,” confirm that version. I’d draft it in the required HTML structure and then run all 14 gates on the draft. The sourced material in the notes (Yle, Riku, TechCrunch, CNET, Zala IP Law, WeLiveSecurity) is enough for it. The gaps the notes already list (Finnish criminal code provisions, DSA notice-and-action timelines, Google processing times) would be stated as open questions, not filled in.